🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked broad protest both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries